Energy Cultures 1
Energy Cultures (2009-2012) was an interdisciplinary research project which developed a better understanding of household energy behaviour, and of opportunities to support adoption of more energy-efficient practices and technologies. The research team backgrounds included human geography, physics, economics, marketing, and law.
The Energy Cultures framework
The Energy Cultures framework was developed by the research team to help understand the drivers of energy-related behaviours, and to help direct attention to the parts of the system that may benefit from change in order to influence energy behaviour in a desired way. The framework (see diagram) depicts energy behaviour as primarily arising from the interactions between three components: norms (individual and shared expectations about what is ‘normal behaviour’), material culture (physical aspects of a home including the form of the building and energy-related technologies) and energy practices (energy-related actions). These in turn are subject to broader influences that are largely outside of the individual’s control, such as standards, subsidies, energy pricing and social marketing campaigns which directly shape householders’ norms, material culture and energy practices.
Figure 1: Energy Cultures Framework
The research involved ten research streams (hyperlink to Research Streams below), with the Energy Cultures framework acting to integrate findings. Reports, publications and selected conference presentations (hyperlink to further down the page) can be found below.
(i) Policy design should consider the triple role of norms, material culture and energy practices in contributing to overall energy behaviour. Each will respond differently to policy interventions. Policy design should consider which of the three elements to target for any given energy issue, while being aware that a change in any one element (e.g. material culture), is likely to lead to a change in others (e.g. practices and norms).
(ii) Households with the highest energy use tend to be those that pay little attention to improving the energy efficiency of their house, own many energy-using appliances, and have little regard to energy-efficient practices. This cluster of households (around 20% of the population) is generally wealthier and thus has fewer barriers than others to making efficiency improvements. This group represents a policy opportunity to achieve significant gains in energy efficiency and conservation.
(iii) The lowest energy users tend to have substandard housing and inefficient energy technologies, yet have very economical energy practices. This combination of circumstances tends to be aligned with cold, and often damp, housing. This cluster of households (around 25% of the population) has lower incomes and restricted choices, creating a substantial barrier to improving their energy situation. The WUNZ programme partially addresses their financial constraints to action, but it needs to be continued, and to include clean, efficient space and hot water heating, as well as other means to assist with financing (e.g. low-interest loans).
(iv) The particular energy-related problems and constraints faced by tenants were evident in many of the research streams. The proportion of people renting is growing, and the tenancy population has characteristics such as poor health that make it a particular priority for substantial policy action to address the lack of drivers for landlords to improve the energy standards of their rental properties.
(v) Achievement-related values – being capable and being intelligent – are strongly linked with energy efficient behaviour. Appeals to such values in energy efficiency social marketing can be expected to continue to be successful.
(vi) Making choices about energy-related changes in the home can be exceedingly complex, and a barrier to action. People value independent trustworthy information to help them in this process. This represents a policy opportunity to support the provision of independent home energy advice.
(vii) A person’s family and friends are the key influences on household energy behaviour changes, more so than media, community action groups or other organisations such as councils, tradespeople or power companies. There are gains to be made by supporting the positive work of social networks.
(viii) Tradespeople and design professionals are, however, very influential in household energy decisions. There is a need for better training in energy efficient products and services, and better incentives to supply them.
(ix) Some of New Zealand’s energy efficiency policies are lagging behind those of other similar OECD countries. Of these, introducing home energy rating and certification schemes and introducing a wider range of Minimum Energy Performance Standards on energy appliances would assist with policy challenges (ii), (iii) and (vi) above.
(x) New Zealand’s energy policy framework should give a central place to energy efficiency. Data collection on energy use and behaviour should be improved in order to support the development and monitoring of energy efficiency policy.
Table 1: Research streams
|Research Project||Research Aim||Research Methods|
|1. Values and behaviour||Examining the link between values and energy behaviours.||In-depth interviews with 100 householders using a ‘laddering’ technique.|
|2. Energy behaviour of NZ households||Collecting and interpreting data on norms, material culture and practices of households.||Survey of 2400 households; statistical analysis of the data.|
|3. Energy Cultures clusters||Segmentation of the NZ population according to energy culture characteristics.||Two-step cluster analysis.|
|4. Understanding consumer choice||Segmentation of the NZ population according to their preferred attributes of space and hot water heating.||Choice modelling across 2400 householders; clustering of responses.|
|5. Minimum Energy Performance Standards||Comparing the range and level of New Zealand’s MEPS with relevant countries internationally.||Desktop study.|
|6. Energy behaviour change||Exploring people’s experiences of making an energy-related change in their home.||Focus groups in Auckland, Wellington and Dunedin.|
|7. Influences on energy behaviour change||Comparing the relative strength of different forms of influences on energy behaviour change.||Survey of residents of a Dunedin suburb; social network analysis.|
|8. Intervention study||Comparing relative impact of two different forms of energy advice on behaviour.||Standard individualised home energy audits, compared with providing advice through community networks.|
|9. Hot water heating choices||Understanding the non-adoption of energy efficient hot water heating systems in New Zealand.||Interviews with householders and tradespeople.|
|10. Legal and regulatory research||Investigating the legal framework for energy efficiency policy making in New Zealand||Law and policy analysis. Comparative analysis.|
Barton, B., Blackwell, S., Carrington, G., Ford, R., Lawson, R., Stephenson, J., Thorsnes, P., Williams, J. (2013) Energy Cultures: Implications for Policymakers. Research Report, Centre for Sustainability, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. ISBN: 978-0-473-23717-2
Barton, B. (2012) The Denominator Problem: Energy Demand in a Sustainable Energy Policy. Policy Quarterly, 9(1): 3-8.
Barton, B. (2012). Energy Efficiency and Rental Accommodation: Dealing with Split Incentives. Hamilton, NZ: University of Waikato Centre for Environmental, Resources and Energy Law, unpublished paper.
Eusterfeldhaus, M., & Barton, B. (2012) Energy Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis of the New Zealand Legal Framework. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law 29:4 431-470. http://www.ibanet.org/Article/Detail.aspx?ArticleUid=a66fd33d-5486-4acf-81da-0dc2538e78a9.
Grieve. C., Lawson, R. & Henry, J. (2012). Understanding the non-adoption of energy efficient hot water heating systems in New Zealand. Energy Policy, 48, 369-373. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142151200451X.
Mirosa, M., Gnoth, D., Lawson, R. & Stephenson, J. (2010, November). Characteristics of Household Energy Behaviours (Centre for the Study of Agriculture, Food and the Environment, University of Otago, unpublished report for EECA).
Mirosa, M., Gnoth, D., Lawson, R., & Stephenson, J., (2011, June) Rationalising Energy-Related Behaviour in the Home: Insights from a Value-Laddering Approach. European Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy Summer Study, France, pp 2109-2119.
Mirosa, M., Lawson, R., & Gnoth, D. (2011) Linking Personal Values to Energy-Efficient Behaviors in the Home. Environment and Behaviour (27) 1-21. http://eab.sagepub.com/content/45/4/455.short.
Stephenson, J., Barton, B., Carrington, G., Gnoth, D., Lawson, R., & Thorsnes, P. (2010). Energy Cultures: A framework for understanding energy behaviours. Energy Policy, 38, 6120–6129. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421510004611.
Stephenson, J., Lawson, R., Carrington, G., Barton, B., Thorsnes, P., & Miranda, M. (2010). The Practice of Interdisciplinarity. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5:7, 271-282.
van den Dungen, S., & Carrington, G. (2011). Minimum Energy Performance Standards: How does New Zealand Compare with Other Countries? CSAFE, University of Otago.
Lawson, R., Mirosa, M., Gnoth, D., & Hunter, A. (2010, December) Personal Values and Energy Efficiency. Presented at the annual conference of the Australia and New Zealand Academy of Marketing, Christchurch, available online at: http://anzmac2010.org/proceedings/pdf/anzmac10Final00306.pdf.
Lawson, R. & Williams, J., (2012, December). Understanding Energy Cultures. Presented at the annual conference of the Australia and New Zealand Academy of Marketing, Adelaide.(http://www.otago.ac.nz/csafe/research/energy/otago055641.pdf)
Lawson, R. & Williams, J. (2012, December). The Nature of Fuel Poverty in New Zealand. Presented at the annual conference of the Australia and New Zealand Academy of Marketing, Adelaide.
Stephenson, J., Ford, B., and Walton, S (2013) Interdisciplinarity in Action: Energy Cultures as a Concept, a Framework, and an Organizing Principle. Plenary presentation at the Climate Mind and Behaviour Symposium, Garrison Institute, Garrison, New York. 9-12 June 2013.
Stephenson, J. & Carswell, P. (2012, September 20-21). Energy Cultures and Social Networks – influences on household energy behaviour. Paper presented at the Energy Efficiency and Behaviour Conference, Helsinki, Finland.
Stephenson, J. (2013) Energy cultures: breaking out of business-as-usual. Keynote address at The Energy Conference, National Energy Research Institute, held at Te Papa, Wellington, New Zealand, Thursday 14 February 2013.
Stephenson, J (2013) Energy Cultures: An interdisciplinary approach to understanding and influencing energy behaviours. Presentation at the Association for Environmental Studies and Sciences conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 19-22 June 2013
Stephenson, J., Lawson R., Carrington G., Barton B., Thorsnes P. (2011) Energy Cultures ? A Framework for Interdisciplinary Research. World Renewable Energy Congress. Linköping, Sweden – Sweden 8–13 May, 2011. Volume 3, Proceedings of the World Renewable Energy Congress, pp1023-1030.
(Click to view pdf)
Thorsnes, P. (2011, June) Household preferences for energy-efficient space and water heating systems. International Association for Energy Economics (IAEE) International Conference, Stockholm, Sweden.